Top journalism site says 'National Science Foundation' is objective source!

Poynter, 12/12/09: "But we should not conflate what they say in the public square with rigorous, peer-reviewed research.

• When partisans present information that they claim is scientific, scrutinize it.
  
• Did a recognized expert in the field conduct the research?
• Where did the funding come from?
  

(A study funded by ExxonMobil may not be

• as credible as one funded by, say, the
  
• National Science Foundation.)"...
  

• "7 Tips for covering Climate change," 12/12/09, by Tom Yulsman, Pounter.org************

D'oh! The National Science Foundation is funded by the US Government which militantly promotes devastating man made climate change.

• The EPA declared CO2 a danger to mankind.

• That's an objective source?

The National Science Foundation received $3 billion in Obama's first stimulus bill.

• Big, bad ExxonMobil is in favor of a carbon tax against the people.
  

The point: BOTH SIDES ARE IN ON THE CARBON SCAM. The media do not report it. They just report the government side.

• No one is reporting the peoples' side, as the
• UK's Lord Lawson noted.