Lord Oxburgh who cleared Climategate figures of scientific malfeasance backs off claim, says didn't look at science after all, moves along

• WHERE ARE WOODWARD AND BERNSTEIN? THIS MATTER CONVICTS US CITIZENS OF CLIMATE CRIMES AND CONDEMNS THEM TO PAY BILLIONS IN REPARATIONS IN PERPETUITY.

The "experts" are casually acknowledging that global warming does not exist, yet no one is making this news. That is, the experts admit they cannot prove their claims about temperatures in the Middle Ages, which is their entire basis for so-called global warming and the hockey stick graph (pictured below). Billions if not trillions have already been invested in something that does not exist.

• After all this time, one can only conclude that major media in the US along with David Rockefeller and others, absolutely despise Americans. We await the reason why, other than extreme mental illness.
  

7/2/10, Australian Broadcasting Company News Watch, "Missing News: Oxburgh Inquiry-science was not the subject of our study"

• "COMMENT: Steve McIntyre continues doing the work of a whole team of ABC investigative reporters revealing that

in the course of the Oxburgh Inquiry Climate Scientist Phil Jones admitted that

• it was probably impossible to do the 1000-year temperature reconstructions

with any accuracy."....

• (continuing): "As McIntyre notes

"Obviously, this would be a hugely important admission relative to this debate, but the Oxburgh Science Appraisal Panel “inquiry”

• did not report this admission

• even though UEA had announced that
  

the Science Appraisal Panel would “re-appraise CRU’s science”."

• In response to McIntyre's question as to why the Oxburgh Inquiry failed to report

Lord Oxburg replied: "the science was not the subject of our study".

• We concur with Steve McIntyre who asks:

"Why would anyone have expected that science would be the subject of study of the Science Appraisal Panel? Well, there’s a good reason why they would.

• The University of East Anglia and Muir Russell said over and over again that the Science Appraisal Panel would, uh,
• “re-appraise” CRU’s “science”."

Read more at Climate Audit Oxburgh and the Jones Admission

• In the meantime we will send a request through to ABC's investigative unit to look into the matter."...

Great rejoicing that Climategate "SCIENCE" was exonerated, now of course we find its 'science' wasn't even studied.

• 4/14/10, Science Magazine, "Oxburgh report clears controversial climate research unit," by S. Reed

"Just over 2 months since the University of East Anglia (UEA) announced an independent

• "reappraisal of the science"

of its Climatic Research Unit's (CRU's) key publications, the result is in.

• The assessment panel today released a report concluding that CRU's research was

honest and fair,

• even though the statistical methods and bookkeeping skills employed by the scientists there could have been improved.

"We found absolutely no evidence of impropriety whatsoever," panel Chair Ron Oxburgh, a former geologist and Shell chair, said at

• a media briefing this morning."...