Entergy among big money behind global warming, Wall St. winner on EPA ruling

The LA Times should first insist that government scientific policy be decided independent of billion dollar business scams and a hockey stick that has been refuted by people with no financial interest in the outcome. Which is incidental to the fact that the East Anglia research group freely admits substantiating foundation data has been irretrievably lost. (per Instruments item 3 attached).

• Failing the first point, the LA Times should inform us of giant business interests behind the global warming scam, investment banks and corporations such as Entergy.
  

Instead, it ridicules those who favor realism, smears them as tools of big business. It's exactly the opposite.

• The LA Times joins with big business and big government against the people.
  

• Entergy was a plaintiff in the 2007 Supreme Court case which it won. Wall Street cheered, and Entergy stock went up. It has since dipped.

1. April 6, 2007: Supreme court CO2 decision favored big business. Big energy company Entergy was among plaintiffs-and winners-in the 2007 US Supreme Court case ruling (5 to 4) that carbon dioxide was a pollutant (4/2/07):

• "Wall Street understood this. On Monday, when the EPA decision came down, Entergy stock
  
• 
  
• jumped to an all-time high of $107.52 per share."...

• The ruling made and continues to make big money for big Entergy Corp.

2. October 2009, Entergy's chairman hysterically advances the possible

• extinction of humanity without urgent action on global warming and

cap and trade. The Chairman of Entergy speaks at a White House meeting portraying his

• giant corporation as a humanitarian against evil Wall Street interests.

3. December 10, 2009, AP, Entergy Chairman invokes deadly threat again, says

• "bullets"

aimed at us due to global warming.

• Ebullient after the EPA CO2 ruling in his company's favor, he says: ""With EPA moving forward, they're sending a clear message that this is a serious problem and

• either you're going to deal with it or we're going to deal with it ," Leonard said
  
• after a speech at the University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service....

"We're playing Russian Roulette with the planet and our economy," Leonard said. "The difference is

• there's a bullet in every chamber except one.""...

Reference.

• 1. "Editorial: Ruling on EPA favors Big Energy," April 6, 2007, Washington Examiner

• 2. "Entergy CEO Warns of Humanity's Extinction if Climate Legislation not Passed," 10/14/09, Gristmill.org, by Brad Johnson

• 3. AP, "Entergy CEO: EPA Sending Congress Message to Act," 12/10/09, by Andrew DeMillo, Seattle Times
  

Shockingly, Entergy also advises that the 'hockey stick' graph is just fine! (item #30)

• via Tom Nelson